There are no irreconcilable differences in any aspect of the design

safiya982

If I introduce them into a system where, depending on the technology, I can count on a price different from that set by the market, as we proposed, it is very likely that new technologies with low operating costs will offer prices for that contract below. the usual price. in the market and that the system compensates or covers the difference that may exist at some point, but generating a price reduction for consumers. So, the question is whether these savings are distributed equitably within the system or whether some groups can be selected over others, which is part of the debate with Germany. There is no conflict with vulnerable domestic consumers. With industrialists, a problem begins to arise: why do some and not others? This has to be resolved.

This rulebook, but it must be crafted in a way that makes us all feel comfortable. Does Spain accept that France uses these contracts in nuclear? We have to look Russia Mobile Number List closely at what France wants, and that is why we have asked it to present concrete proposals for the drafting of the agreement. France has a very high percentage of electricity that comes from a state company (nuclear) that has had a special regime to facilitate the emergence of competitors. How is a contract for differences established for such a high percentage of electricity when there is no real competition with third parties? At this moment, what France is wondering is how to undertake an investment in the renovation of its entire nuclear fleet and how to cover the cost of this large-scale renovation.



We want to understand exactly what you want and make sure it doesn't create distortions in the old market. And then there is Poland's request to continue subsidizing coal. Poland demands exceptional treatment through capacity market mechanisms. We believe that capacity markets - which have been proven for a long time, that is, I pay you to be available - are a good instrument to facilitate storage. They think it is a good instrument to guarantee security of supply and they link their security of supply not to clean technologies but to the use of coal. That is, skipping what has been the construction of carbon emission thresholds in recent years in Europe. It is an obviously sensitive issue and an exceptional measure due to the war in Ukraine, but then it is treated as an exceptional measure, with conditions and limits, that has been the other big debate.