|
|
The decision in this case is issued by the UOKiK Court and the party to the proceedings has days to file an appeal. Obstructing or preventing a search may result in the imposition of a severe financial penalty. Therefore, broadly understood cooperation is recommended in such cases, which will improve and speed up the entire process. Penalties imposed by the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection The amended Act devotes a lot of space and attention to issues related to imposing penalties, reducing these penalties or refraining from imposing them.
As a rule, the penalties imposed are aimed at ending unfair practices and repairing the damage they have caused. There philippines photo editor may be many means to achieve this goal, some of them are listed in the Act, but this is not a closed catalog. It should be borne in mind that the penalty does not always have to be financial , the Act also provides for behavioral or structural remedies,which should be proportionate to the infringement committed and lead to its effective cessation. The Act lacks a definition of behavioral or structural activities; it only provides information at a high level of generality about what activities bear such characteristics.
The explanatory memorandum to the Act states that national competition protection authorities should choose the measure that is the least burdensome for a given enterprise. So we can only hope that this will happen in practice. Summary The amendment to the Act on Competition and Consumer Protection contains many new provisions, which are described in a very extensive and complex way. For this reason, the article only mentions some of them and the main intention was to draw attention to the fact that another amendment to the Act is already in force.
|
|
發表於 2023-10-10 11:21:42