|
|
For example, if someone in a room with an open window says I'm a little cold it's usually an implicit request to close the window. Google is getting better at interpreting language at a pragmatic level and identifying implicit meaning through contextual cues. For example, if you search for do I need a coat today, it will actually give you weather results even though the search query doesn't explicitly ask for weather information. To understand that the search query Do I need a coat today actually means what's the weather near me? Google has to consider contextual information.
This contextual information includes the searcher's location and possible A practical explanation of the implied meaning. Now unless Google is actually a real human being tirelessly feeding us information every hour of every day, we can safely assume that Google never wears a jacket. However it is understood photo retouching that jackets are required depending on weather conditions. Using only the words provided in the search already leverages this contextual information to match searchers with weather results. The results are not only related to the weather but also to the searcher's location. Google provides us with meaningful results through pragmatic analysis and other linguistic evaluations.
Even when our searches are not well defined. Linguistic approaches that take into account pragmatics must accurately account for the needs of the searcher. Most importantly, show that you understand these needs with relevant solutions. Understanding Words Morphologically There is a fairly common misconception that only the exact form of a keyword is looked at when providing search results. But your target keywords are often more flexible than you think. Since Google has a good understanding of morphology, the way we form words, it is able to understand different variations and forms of keywords. The word walk may be formed slightly differently in everyday conversation depending on what is being said.
|
|
發表於 2023-10-10 16:26:25