Aposed does not represent a problem of interpretation of some legal provisions the clarification of which depends on the resolution of the merits of the case but involves the establishment of the legal classification of the facts with which the court was referred and in subsidiarily if the referral would be considered admissible it was argued that in the situation where in the same circumstance an action is carried out that has as its object both highrisk drugs and highrisk drugs there is an ideal contest of crimes consisting of the crimes provided for by art. para. from Law no.
Rgarding the prevention and combating of drug trafficking and Country Email List illicit consumption republished with subsequent amendments and additions and art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions so that when several repeated actions are carried out at different time intervals based on the same criminal resolution the provisions regarding the actual contest of crimes respectively the crimes provided for by art. . para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions and art. para. from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions both in continued form.
The President of the Panel for solving some legal issues in criminal matters closed reserving the case in the ruling. HIGH COURT on the legal issue with which it was referred states the following I. Holder and subject of notification Bucharest Court of Appeal Second Criminal Section by Decision dated November given in File no. notified the High Court of Cassation and Justice based on the provisions of art. of the Code of Criminal Procedure in order to issue a preliminary decision for resolving the following legal issue when a person commits in the same circumstance one or more actions that may constitute the material element according to.
發表於 2023-12-27 16:23:32
