|
|
Many people often ask me about the use of images on the internet, that is, whether they can freely use the images they find on google or any other corner of the internet on their website or blog, or if it is enough to mention the author of the images. The image to be able to use it. In that case I usually give two very graphic examples, although a little absurd: one is what would happen if we found an envelope full of artistic and dazzling photographs on the street, lying on the ground, could I use them with total freedom? Or perhaps, is it possible that they belong to someone? The other example that I usually give is: what would happen if they took a photo of your boyfriend/girlfriend from facebook and posted it on a massage website with a happy ending, but at the bottom they said that you were the author of the photo? Like not, right? Well, that is why the answer I can give you is clear and concise: no, you cannot freely use the images that you obtain through the internet for your blog or website, without there being a risk that you will have to respond to whoever holds the rights.
Author of it, even if you put his name at the bottom Italy Telegram Number Data of the photo. Because? Well, simply because the intellectual property law and other community and international regulations protect the authorship rights of works, and therefore of images. Protection of intellectual property law the intellectual property law hereinafter lpi – protects the author of an image by the sole fact of its creation, showing full disposition and the exclusive right to exploit the work. , without more limitations than those established in the law. Said lpi distinguishes between work (photographic work or design) and mere photography. By work we could understand images that are original (that reflect the personality of their author) and that require considerable creative work, while by mere photographs we can understand a capture of reality without that originality or creativity.
Distinguishing one category from another can be very easy or very difficult, so in difficult cases, we will always be in the hands of the judges. I highlight this distinction, because the protection that the lpi grants to a work will last throughout life. Of the author and seventy years from his death, while in the case of mere photographs, the protection is 25 years from the year following their taking. As you can see, in any case we have long protection periods, so the author of any image could try to tickle us. There are two assumptions included in the law, which would allow us to use images without the author's consent: teaching.- fragments of other foreign works of any nature may be included in our own work, as long as they are works already disclosed and their inclusion is made as a citation for analysis, comment or critical judgment . Such use may only be made for teaching or research purposes, to the extent justified by the purpose of that incorporation and indicating the source and the name of the author of the work used . Parody.- consent of the author is not required to transform a work, when it is a parody of a published work, as long as there is no risk of confusion with it nor damage is inferred to the original work of its author.
|
|
發表於 2024-3-7 18:21:37